Introduction
The analysis method is adopted from Winfried Crombie’s analysis of Milton’s “Areopagitica”. My analysis will be based on discoursal relationships in which logico-deductive semantic relations (eg. cause-effect relationships) and associative semantic relations (eg. compare-contrast relationships) interact and reinforce one another. For my analysis I will use a short story from Ernest Hemingway, the name of the short story is “A Clean, Well-Lighted Place”.
Semantic relationships between discourse segments underlie all coherent stretches of language (Crombie,1989) Accordingly, for my analysis, I will try to exemplify this notion. For this I will use the framawork below:
1) Associative Relations:
i. simple contrast,
ii. comparative similarity,
iii. statement affirmation,
iv. statement denial,
v. concession – contraexpectation.
2) Logico-Deductive Relations:
i. reson – result,
ii. grounds – conclusion,
iii. condition – consequence.
3) Tempero-Contigual Relations
i. chronological sequence,
ii. temporal overlap.
Analysis
1) Associative Relations:
simple contrast,
A1) "He's lonely. I'm not lonely. I have a wife waiting in bed for me." (making contrast between the old man and himself, the waiter)
B1) "We are of two different kinds," the older waiter said. (contrasting himself to the other waiter)
B2) "The light is very bright and pleasant but the bar is unpolished,"the waiter said.” (stressing the contrast between the light and the bar)
comparative similarity,
A1) "You have everything I have." (comparing himself to the other waiter)
B1) “It was all a nothing and a man was a nothing too.” (comparing human beings to all other things)
statement affirmation,
A1) "He must be eighty years old."
B1)
"Anyway I should say he was eighty."
(confirmation about the age
of the old man)
A2)
"It's not the same."
B2) "No, it is not," agreed the waiter with a wife. He did not wish to be
unjust. He was only in a hurry.
(agreement about the old
man’s situation being different)
A3)
"I have confidence. I am all confidence."
B3) "You have youth, confidence, and a job," the older waiter said."You
have everything."
(the older waiter agrees about younger waiter’s having everything)
A4) "He's drunk now," he said.
B4) "He's drunk every night."
(they agree about the old
man’s being drunk)
statement denial,
A1) "I know." "I wouldn't want to be that old. An old man is a nasty thing."
B1) "Not always. This old man is clean. He drinks without spilling. Even now, drunk. Look at him." (older waiter desagrees about the old man’s being nasty)
A2) "A wife would be no good to him now."
B2)"You can't tell. He might be better with a wife.” (the older waiter denies the younger waiter’s idea about a wife)
concession – contraexpectation.
B1) "It is not only a question of youth and confidence although those things are very beautiful. Each night I am reluctant to close up because there may be some one who needs the cafe." (the older waiter doen’t want to close, this is unexpected from a waiter at that time of the night)
B2) “The waiter poured on into the glass so that the brandy slopped over and ran down the stem into the top saucer of the pile.” (the younger waiter pours the brandy out of the glass, this is rude)
2) Logico-Deductive Relations:
reson – result,
B1) “In the day time the street was dusty, but at night the dew settled the dust and the old man liked to sit late because he was deaf and now at night it was quiet and he felt the difference.” (because the night is silent the deaf man comes at nights)
B2) “The two waiters inside the cafe knew that the old man was a little drunk, and while he was a good client they knew that if he became too drunk he would leave without paying, so they kept watch on him.” (sometimes the old man doesn’t pay for his drinks so the waiters are careful)
grounds – conclusion,
A1) “The waiter watched him go down the street, a very oldman walking unsteadily but with dignity.” (the waiter infers that the old man is stoic from the way he walks with dignity)
B1) "Not always. This old man is clean. He drinks without spilling. Even now, drunk. Look at him." (the older waiter concludes that the old man is clean from the way he drinks)
A2)
"Last week he tried to commit suicide," one waiter said.
B2) "Why?"
A2) "He was in despair."
B2) "What about?"
A2) "Nothing."
B2) "How do you know it was nothing?"
A2) "He has plenty of money."
(the younger waiter comes to
the conclusion that if the man has plenty of money he has no reason to kill
himself)
condition – consequence.
A1)
"The guard will pick him up," one waiter said.
B1) "What does it matter if he gets what he's after?"
(if the walks on the streets
with a moman, the consequences would be bad for him, he could be picked up)
This way of analyzing a literary text could be very helpful in enhancing a better understanding of language use and the semantic relationships in a language. For foreign language learners it is essential to be aware of this kind of semantic relations within the target language. Discourse awareness could be implemented into the curriculum so as to bring variety into the activites and the comprehension of linguistic input.
Reference
Crombie, W. (1989): “Semantic Relational Structuring in Milton’s Areopagitica”
Tuncer Can
Contact me at : tcan@istanbul.edu.tr / Admin@ingilish.com Tuncer Can
Home / ELT Materials /Coursebook Reports / Learn Turkish / ELT Conferences /Private Lessons / Online Translation /Links /Link Exchange/ E-Shop
© copyright 2001-2007 www.ingilish.com